FK rumination

[annavere]

I'm about halfway through season one and I find LaCroix creepy to an unusually visceral degree. This is a bit surprising to me, because I normally have a weakness for villains - but I like them with enough human qualities to relate to, to explore their moral choices and failings, and LaCroix is on another level entirely. Nigel Bennett does a great job portraying him, but if I was going to compare him to another vampire, it would be the older archetypes, the plague carriers.

I've been lurking in the HL discord, and there's a lot of discussion of the Horsemen going on, so it's on my mind, and the thing is, the Horsemen never felt very apocalyptic to me. They felt like four louts raising hell. LaCroix feels like true pestilence made flesh, a malignancy creeping at Nick's heels, a shadow filling the space where a man once lived and died (yes, I'm reading A Wizard of Earthsea right now, so pursuant shadows are on my mind). Genuinely, completely unsettling. More of a vampire than most vampires.

Comments

[teratornis]

As hard as I bounced off this show the first time I tried it out, your posts have been making me much more curious about aspects of it, and now I'm particularly curious about LaCroix. I'm often interested to see how an actor portrays a character that is fundamentally inhuman, and very few roles truly hit that note for me. I'd be curious to see how this one is played.

Agreed about the Horsemen, at any rate. I always thought their mystique must have come more from the fact that they lasted so long than anything else. They were probably just normal if prolific and brutal raiders, but you slap a specific mask on a group of guys and they hang around in that form for generations, it's gonna eventually make an impression. Also why I tend to think of them as more a source of inspiration for the biblical Four Horsemen, rather than directly, actually them.